Several other view sex variations in prominent partner attributes: The effects from promoting the traditional ladies intercourse role

Jost, J. T., and Kay, A great. C. (2005). Connection with benevolent sexism and you can subservient gender stereotypes: Consequences having particular and you may diffuse forms of program justification. J. People. Soc. Psychol. 88, 498–509. doi: -.3.498

Kay, Good. C., Go out, Meters. V., Zanna, M. P., and you will Nussbaum, An effective. D. (2013). The newest insidious (and you can ironic) results of self-confident stereotypes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 287–291. doi: /j.jesp.

Kervyn, N., Bergsieker, H. B., and you may Fiske, S. T. (2012). The fresh new innuendo impact: Hearing the good but inferring the new bad. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. forty-eight, 77–85. doi: /j.jesp.

Kilianski, S. Age., and you can Rudman, L. A beneficial. (1998). In search of they each other suggests: Create people agree of benevolent sexism? Intercourse Spots 39, 333–352.

Mae, L., and you may Carlston, D. E. (2005). Hoist yourself petard: Whenever prejudiced feedback is approved and you can backfire for the audio system. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41, 240–255. doi: /j.jesp.

Neely, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and you can retrieval off lexical recollections: Research to own facilitatory and you may inhibitory processes. Thoughts Cogn. 4, 648–654. (suite…)

Read More »